Cruz Focused On Pelosi’s Rejection Of Troops Ahead Of J6

According to a newly surfaced video clip, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) focused on then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s rejection of an offer to deploy thousands of National Guard soldiers ahead of a speech by then-President Donald Trump in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 6, 2021, during Kash Patel’s confirmation hearings to become the next FBI director.

As noted by the site Legal Insurrection, during the riot that day at the U.S. Capitol Building, Patel was serving as chief of staff to then-acting Secretary of Defense Christopher C. Miller. In this role, Patel had direct access to and knowledge of the government’s security arrangements at the time.

At one point during Patel’s confirmation hearing, Cruz asked him what he was doing during the riot.

“On that day, specifically, responding to, preparing to mobilize and employ the National Guard once we got the lawful request from the local governing authority, which was the mayor of DC and the speaker of the House,” Patel responded.

“Now, how many days in advance were you working to prepare the Department of Defense to help secure the Capitol on January 6?” Cruz asked.

“Days in advance, Senator, we were in the Oval Office on an unrelated national security matter with the President of the United States, the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and myself and the President authorized up to 20,000 plus National Guard men and women to secure any security measures necessarily related to the capital,” Patel said. “We were moving to the fullest extent of the law before the requisite request came from a local governing authority days ahead of time.”

“While you were chief of staff at DOD, how many times did DOD approach Capitol Police and ask if they needed National Guard assistance?” asked the Texas Republican.

Patel answered, “I believe those letters are well-documented. Numerous instances, and [on] numerous of those instances, those requests were shut down.”

“Now, am I correct that the Capital Sergeant at Arms said assistance was unnecessary?” Cruz asked.

“That’s correct, Senator.”

“Who did the Sergeant at Arms report to?” Cruz continued.

“The speaker of the House,” said Patel.

“That would have been Nancy Pelosi at the time. Is that correct?” Cruz asked.

“Yes, Senator.”

Cruz then asked if it would also include then-Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.

“The Sergeant at Arms, yes, Senator, reports up there,” Patel replied.

“Did Mayor [Muriel] Bowser, the Democrat elected mayor in DC, either request or allow National Guard assistance?” Cruz pressed.

Patel noted that Bowser had “put in writing on the days leading up to January 6th, a declination for National Guard additional support, and that letter is available publicly to the world.”

“Just to speak English for folks at home, a declination meant she said, no, don’t send National Guard. Is that right?”

“Yes sir,” Patel responded.

WATCH:

 

Patel’s testimony is supported by the former chief of the U.S. Capitol Police and then-President Trump regarding Pelosi’s role in failing to secure the Capitol ahead of Jan. 6.

During testimony before a House committee, Steven Sund claimed that three days before the riot at the Capitol Building, U.S. House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving rejected Sund’s request to deploy hundreds of National Guard soldiers because Irving told him then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) would “never go for it,” The Epoch Times reported in October 2023.

Sund’s comments came during testimony before the House Oversight Committee during a 90-minute hearing, the outlet added, his first before a House panel since he was forced to resign his post two days after the riot. Also, he was never called at all to testify before Pelosi’s hand-picked Jan. 6 Committee, the outlet added.

Sund said he was frustrated by the refusal of the offer of troops because their presence that day, he believes, would have been a “game-changer.”

According to a newly surfaced video clip, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) focused on then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s rejection of an offer to deploy thousands of National Guard soldiers ahead of a speech by then-President Donald Trump in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 6, 2021, during Kash Patel’s confirmation hearings to become the next FBI director.

As noted by the site Legal Insurrection, during the riot that day at the U.S. Capitol Building, Patel was serving as chief of staff to then-acting Secretary of Defense Christopher C. Miller. In this role, Patel had direct access to and knowledge of the government’s security arrangements at the time.

At one point during Patel’s confirmation hearing, Cruz asked him what he was doing during the riot.

“On that day, specifically, responding to, preparing to mobilize and employ the National Guard once we got the lawful request from the local governing authority, which was the mayor of DC and the speaker of the House,” Patel responded.

“Now, how many days in advance were you working to prepare the Department of Defense to help secure the Capitol on January 6?” Cruz asked.

“Days in advance, Senator, we were in the Oval Office on an unrelated national security matter with the President of the United States, the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and myself and the President authorized up to 20,000 plus National Guard men and women to secure any security measures necessarily related to the capital,” Patel said. “We were moving to the fullest extent of the law before the requisite request came from a local governing authority days ahead of time.”

“While you were chief of staff at DOD, how many times did DOD approach Capitol Police and ask if they needed National Guard assistance?” asked the Texas Republican.

Patel answered, “I believe those letters are well-documented. Numerous instances, and [on] numerous of those instances, those requests were shut down.”

“Now, am I correct that the Capital Sergeant at Arms said assistance was unnecessary?” Cruz asked.

“That’s correct, Senator.”

“Who did the Sergeant at Arms report to?” Cruz continued.

“The speaker of the House,” said Patel.

“That would have been Nancy Pelosi at the time. Is that correct?” Cruz asked.

“Yes, Senator.”

Cruz then asked if it would also include then-Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.

“The Sergeant at Arms, yes, Senator, reports up there,” Patel replied.

“Did Mayor [Muriel] Bowser, the Democrat elected mayor in DC, either request or allow National Guard assistance?” Cruz pressed.

Patel noted that Bowser had “put in writing on the days leading up to January 6th, a declination for National Guard additional support, and that letter is available publicly to the world.”

“Just to speak English for folks at home, a declination meant she said, no, don’t send National Guard. Is that right?”

“Yes sir,” Patel responded.

WATCH:

 

Patel’s testimony is supported by the former chief of the U.S. Capitol Police and then-President Trump regarding Pelosi’s role in failing to secure the Capitol ahead of Jan. 6.

During testimony before a House committee, Steven Sund claimed that three days before the riot at the Capitol Building, U.S. House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving rejected Sund’s request to deploy hundreds of National Guard soldiers because Irving told him then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) would “never go for it,” The Epoch Times reported in October 2023.

Sund’s comments came during testimony before the House Oversight Committee during a 90-minute hearing, the outlet added, his first before a House panel since he was forced to resign his post two days after the riot. Also, he was never called at all to testify before Pelosi’s hand-picked Jan. 6 Committee, the outlet added.

Sund said he was frustrated by the refusal of the offer of troops because their presence that day, he believes, would have been a “game-changer.”

Related Posts

Miss Helen, a long-time regular at our café, was sitting by herself at a table set up for her 72nd birthday, with no one showing up to join her. When I asked where her guests were, she quietly said that none of her family had come. It was heartbreaking, so I went to the manager’s office with a plan to make things right. (check in first comment👇)

Laughed with her, reminded her she was loved. Then the café owner walked in. We held our breath, expecting backlash.Instead, he pulled up a chair and joined…

I JUST DON’T UNDERSTAND HOW SOMEONE CAN COME TO CHURCH LIKE THIS! I THEN CONFRONTED HER AND HER RESPONSE LEFT ME IN SHOCK!After the service, I saw her outside and decided to approach her. I tried to be polite, but I told her that I felt her look wasn’t really appropriate for church and maybe she should consider toning it down in such a setting.She looked at me like I was crazy and sharply told me something that left me in shock…

A female churchgoer shared a story of a woman who visited the church and attended the service one Sunday. The person sharing the story believed the woman…

Kaley Cuoco’s Latest Social Media Post Sparks Discussion….see more

The internet is no stranger to viral moments that generate conversation, and recently, actress Kaley Cuoco—best known for her role in The Big Bang Theory—found herself at…

Elvis Presley’s 1962 Private Jet Is Up For Auction – Here’s How It Looks Inside

Tattooed “Black Alien” Can’t Find Job Due To His Looks, Here’s What He Looked Like Before Elvis Presley’s 1962 Private Jet Is Up For Auction – Here’s…

MY PARENTS SAID SHE’S “TOO BIG” FOR ME—BUT THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT I’M ABOUT TO DO So here’s how the last Sunday dinner went down. I brought my fiancée, Mallory, over to meet my parents officially. She’s tall, broad-shouldered, platinum blonde, and yeah—she’s not a size two. But Mallory’s the warmest, sharpest, most loyal person I’ve ever met. She lights up every room she walks into, even if she doesn’t fit into whatever narrow box people expect. My mom barely smiled when she hugged her. My dad wouldn’t even look her in the eye. The whole meal felt like sitting on top of a powder keg. Then, as soon as Mallory stepped out to take a call, my mom leaned in like she couldn’t wait. She said, dead serious, “Honey… you sure you want to marry someone that big? You’re a small guy. It’s not a good match.” My dad chimed in, talking about “health” and how I’d “resent it later.” I felt like the table flipped upside down. I couldn’t even process it at first. I just stared at them, thinking about how Mallory always cooks for me when I’m stressed, how she pays attention to every little thing I like, how she’s the first person I’ve ever felt completely safe with. I didn’t argue. I didn’t defend her. I just said nothing. (continues in the first comment🗨️⬇️

Last Sunday dinner was supposed to be a big step forward. I brought my fiancée, Mallory, over to my parents’ house for an official introduction. I wanted…

MY LANDLORD RAISED MY RENT BECAUSE I GOT A PROMOTION—BIG MISTAKE MESSING WITH A SINGLE WORKING MOM OF THREE I’m a single mom of three—4, 7, and 11—and work full-time in logistics. We live in a modest two-bedroom rental. My kids share a room; I sleep on a pull-out couch. Not ideal, but it’s safe and close to school and work. Our landlord, Frank, thinks owning property makes him a genius. Ignores texts, delays repairs, and once said, “You should be grateful you’ve got a place at all with all those kids.” Still, I stayed. The rent kept creeping up, but it was manageable—until my promotion. After eight years of showing up early and never using sick days, I became operations manager. The raise wasn’t huge, but it meant I could finally say yes to little things for kids—field trips, cereal that isn’t store brand, shoes that fit. I posted a small LinkedIn update: “Proud to say I’ve been promoted to Operations Manager. Hard work pays off.” Two days later, I got this email: “Rental Adjustment Notice.” Frank was raising my rent by $500. No improvements. No reason. Just: “Saw your little promotion post—congrats! Figured now’s the perfect time to squeeze a bit more out of you.” I called him. “Why now?” His response: “You wanted a career and a bunch of kids—that comes with bills. You’re not broke anymore, so don’t expect charity. This is business, not a daycare.” Now, I could’ve gone to housing services. I could’ve called a lawyer. But I had a better idea. One that would cost me nothing… and teach Frank everything. I knew two things about Frank: 1. He was lazy. ⬇️⬇️ (Continues in comment)

Part 1 of 6: The Quiet Victory and the Quiet Threat I’m not a petty person. Petty doesn’t fit into my schedule. Between raising three kids and…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *